Proof that Jimmy Carter is Senile

[Dr Keghead]

Nuff said...

[on the road]

And here's proof that Ronald Reagan was senile WHILE he was president of the United States.

Nuff said.

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/...heimers-appear
http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...-president-son
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/...d-lesley-stahl

[Grandpa1]

And here's proof that Ronald Reagan was senile WHILE he was president of the United States.

Nuff said.

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/...heimers-appear
http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...-president-son
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/...d-lesley-stahl

Just goes to show you that a sick demented Repub president is better than a sick demented Demo pres.
I began my business when Carter was president and almost didn't survive because of the 25% interest rate banks charged for equipment loans. When Reagan came in we thrived. I know the difference.

[jmohme]

Ok, Senility is his excuse for the way he is today.
What was his excuse then?

As far as the actual state of mind of Carter, Reagan, or any other president for that matter. You would have to be a little touched in the head to even want that job!

[Cruiseman]

Just goes to show you that a sick demented Repub president is better than a sick demented Demo pres.
I began my business when Carter was president and almost didn't survive because of the 25% interest rate banks charged for equipment loans. When Reagan came in we thrived. I know the difference.

I remember paying 22% interest on a car loan.

[alphadog]

Jimmy Carter says he would have defeated Reagan had he been more 'manly' | WashingtonExaminer.com
http://washingtonexaminer.com

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/...heimers-appear
http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...-president-son
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/...d-lesley-stahl

Progressive fantasy delusions

[In2cjs]

27% under Carter for floor plan credit. I'ld take a Reagan at his worst over what we have now anyday.

[on the road]

Jimmy Carter says he would have defeated Reagan had he been more 'manly' | WashingtonExaminer.com
http://washingtonexaminer.com

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/...heimers-appear
http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...-president-son
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/...d-lesley-stahl

Progressive fantasy delusions

Predictable rightist denial.

[alphadog]

Standard rightist denial.

Well, you did get I'm the rightist correct...:D

[hparsons]

Jimmy Carter says he would have defeated Reagan had he been more 'manly' | WashingtonExaminer.com
http://washingtonexaminer.com

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/...heimers-appear
http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...-president-son
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/...d-lesley-stahl

Progressive fantasy delusions

Yep, Anyone using "Mother Jones" as their source info has pretty much already lost the battle.

Besides, I thought "on the road" said he was gone and not coming back. How can anyone take his "word" for anything?

[on the road]

Yep, Anyone using "Mother Jones" as their source info has pretty much already lost the battle.

Besides, I thought "on the road" said he was gone and not coming back. How can anyone take his "word" for anything?

Based on your reputation on the other forum, that's never been one of your stronger suits.

[TheGLForum]

Besides, I thought "on the road" said he was gone and not coming back. How can anyone take his "word" for anything?

Based on your reputation on the other forum, that's never been one of your stronger suits.

I take it that you two are not riding buddies

[Dr Keghead]

And based on your reputation on the other forum, that attempt had generally proven to have been an effort in futility..

At least he (hparsons) is using his own name on both boards... unlike you.

[on the road]

At least he (hparsons) is using his own name on both boards... unlike you.

I'll be damned. I had absolutely no idea that was a requirement.

[hparsons]

Based on your reputation on the other forum, that's never been one of your stronger suits.

Really? I don't think I've ever been accused by anyone "there" of not keeping my word. As to your nonsense in another thread about me being banned for "misbehaving", you must have some inside information that the rest of us don't have. When I try to log in and get the banned message, it states no reason given.

It's probably worth noting that many consider the bans from "over there" to be a badge of honor. They don't seem to be very consistent on why they ban folks; other than a moderator deciding they don't like someone. Would you, with your "inside information" happen to be one of those moderators?

But, that's the "other forum", how about this forum? You really seem to have contributed little, and most definitely said you were done with us here, but you keep coming back.

Why?

[hparsons]

I take it that you two are not riding buddies

Riding buddies? Hmmm, don't know, it's hard to say when someone hides behind a fake name. Shoot, I might have ridden with him a bunch of times, without knowing it. On the other hand, he may not even have a bike? Who's to know?

How about it otr, wanna join us for a ride? Bunch of us here are going to meet in Harrison this month. Instead of using the name "on the road", why not actually get on the road and join us?

[on the road]

Really? I don't think I've ever been accused of anyone "there" for not keeping my word. As to your nonsense in another thread about me being banned for "misbehaving", you must have some inside information that the rest of us don't have. When I try to log in and get the banned message, it states no reason given.

It's probably worth noting that many consider the bans from "over there" to be a badge of honor. They don't seem to be very consistent on why they ban folks; other than a moderator deciding they don't like someone. Would you, with your "inside information" happen to be one of those moderators?

But, that's the "other forum", how about this forum? You really seem to have contributed little, and most definitely said you were done with us here, but you keep coming back.

Why?

I'm not privy to *why* you were banned but it's probably safe to assume that it's because you didn't play well with others.
It's also a safe fair bet that most adults don't consider being kicked off of an internet motorcycle forum to be a "badge of honor".

Blaming a moderator(s) for being banned is like a school boy blaming his teacher for suspending him.
"I didn't do anything, it's the teachers fault".
That won't work.

[530ktm]

This would be good to say the least but who would know who is who?

[on the road]

Riding buddies? Hmmm, don't know, it's hard to say when someone hides behind a fake name. Shoot, I might have ridden with him a bunch of times, without knowing it. On the other hand, he may not even have a bike? Who's to know?

What's this? People hiding behind fake names?
The nerve of some people!

Cruiseman
Ghostman
Msnden,
Gr8phun
Lone ranger
Road rat
530ktm
Networkguy3
Azandrider
Bucfan11
Dr Keghead

[Dr Keghead]

I'll be damned. I had absolutely no idea that was a requirement.

I suspect you're hiding your true identity so as not to alienate your leftist friends over on the other board. That being said, I smell something whenever you post here... it smells somewhat like Kansas